THE DIFFERENCE OF PAIN PERCEPTION BETWEEN KETOPROFEN SUPPOSITORY AND 1% PERIPROSTATIC LIDOCAINE INJECTION

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published 2012-07-03
Abdul Azis Wahjoe Djatisoesanto Doddy M. Soebadi Lukman Hakim Budiono Budiono

Abstract

Objective: To compare the pain control results of ketoprofen suppository and periprostatic injection of lidocaine 1% for prostate biopsy. Material & Method: A total of 30 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy were randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of 15 patients received 200 mg of ketoprofen suppository. Group 2 received 1% periprostatic lidocaine injection. A visual analog scale was used to assess the pain score during prostate biopsy. Statistical analysis of pain scores was performed using independent t-test and Pearson correlation test. Results: The 2 groups were homogenous in age and prostate volume. There was significant difference in pain score among groups 1 and 2 during prostate biopsy (mean VAS ± SD 0,8 ± 0,8 and 4,5 ± 1,6 respectively, p < 0,0001). There was no significant correlation between pain perception with age (p = 0,779), or prostate volume (p = 0,389) in both groups. Conclusion: Periprostatic lidocaine injection is more effective for decreasing the pain for prostate biopsy compared to ketoprofen suppository. Keywords: Prostate biopsy, pain, transrectal ultrasonography, periprostatic nerve block, visual analog scale.


##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References

Klein EA, Platz EA, Thompson IM. Epidemiology, etiology, and prevention of prostate cancer. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 2007; 90: 2845-57.

Heidenreich A, Bolla M. Guidelines on prostate cancer. European Association of Urology Guidelines; 2010. p. 9–16.

Alavi AS, Soloway MS, Vaidya A, Lynne CM, Gheiler EL. Local anesthesia for ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized trial comparing 2 methods. J Urol. 2001; 166: 1343–5.

Ramey JR, Halpern EJ, Gomella LG. Ultrasonography and biopsy of the prostate. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 2007; 92: 2883–92.

Autorino R, Sio MD, Lorenzo GD, Damiano R, Perdona S, Cindolo L, et al. How to decrease pain during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: A look at the literature. J Urol. 2005; 174: 2091–7.

Giannarini G, Autorino R, Valent F, Mogorovich A, Manassero F, Maria MD, et al. Combination of perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine cream and periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: A randomized, controlled trial. J Urol. 2009; 181: 585–93.

Leibovici D, Zisman A, Siegel YI, Sella A, Kleinmann J, Lindner A. Local anesthesia for prostate biopsy by periprostatic lidocaine injection: A double-blind placebo controlled study. J Urol. 2002; 167: 563–5.

Bingqian L, Peihuan L, Yudong W, Jinxing W, Zhiyong W. Intraprostatic local anesthesia with periprostatic nerve block for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2009; 182: 479–84.

Addla SK, Adeyoju AAB, Wemyss-holden GD, Neilson D. Local anaesthetic for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur Urol. 2003; 43: 441–3.

Nash PA, Bruce JE, Indudhara R, Shinohara K. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systematic needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol. 1996; 155: 607–9.

Haq A, Patel HRH, Habib MR, Donaldson PJ, Parry JRW. Diclofenac suppository analgesia for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies of the prostate: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2004; 171: 1489–91.

Lee HY, Lee HJ, Byun SS, Lee SE, Hong SK, Kim SH. Effect of intraprostatic local anesthesia during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: Comparison of 3 methods in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. J Urol. 2007; 178: 469–72.

Taverna G, Maffezzini M, Benetti A, Seveso M, Giusti G, Graziotti P. A single injection of lidocaine as local anesthesia for ultrasound guided needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol. 2002; 167: 222–3.

Mutaguchi K, Shinohara K, Matsubara A, Yasumoto H, Mita K, Usui T. Local anesthesia during 10 core biopsy of the prostate: Comparison of 2 methods. J Urol. 2005; 173: 742–5.

Soloway MS, Obek C. Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2000; 163: 172–3.

Crundwell MC, Cooke PW, Wallace DMA. Patients tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy; An audit of 104 cases. BJU Int. 1999; 83: 792-5.

Tjahyo MD, Umbas R. Evaluasi toleransi pasien terhadap nyeri pada biopsi prostat transrektal dengan panduan ultrasonografi. Jurnal Urologi Indonesia. 2003; 12: 17–9.

Cam K, Sener M, Kayikci A, Akman Y, Erol A. Combined periprostatic and intraprostatic local anesthesia for prostate biopsy: A double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized trial. J Urol. 2008; 180: 141–5.

Afdal, Umbas R. Evaluasi nyeri biopsi prostat transrektal dengan pemberian Na Diklofenak 100 mg suppositoria. Sub Bagian Urologi FKUI; 2005. p. 1–10.

Mallick S, Humbert M, Braud F, Fofana M, Blanchet P. Local anesthesia before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: Comparison of 2 methods in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2004; 171: 730–3.

Alvarino, Umbas R. Penggunaan anestesi lokal periprostat sebelum biopsi prostat transrektal. Majalah Kedokteran Indonesia. 2005; 55: 397-401.

Wilmana PF. Analgesik-antipiretik analgesik anti-inflamasi nonsteroid dan obat pirai. Farmakologi dan terapi. 4th ed. Jakarta: Gaya Baru; 2003. p. 208–18.

White PF. The role of nonopioid analgesic techniques in the management of postoperative pain. Textbook of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. New York: McGraw Hill; 2007. p. 1109-10.

Sunaryo. Kokain dan anestetik lokal sintetik. Farmakologi dan terapi. 4th ed. Jakarta: Gaya Baru; 2003. p. 234–41.

Cevik I, Ozveri H, Ozdal D, Akdas A. Lack of effect of intrarectal lidocaine for pain control during transrectal prostate biopsy: A randomized prospective study. Eur Urol. 2002; 42: 217–20.

Section
July 2012 Vol. 19 No. 2
Copyright Information
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine/Airlangga University