DIURETIC DOPPLER ULTRASOUND FOR EVALUATING OBSTRUCTED AND NON-OBSTRUCTED KIDNEY

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published 2013-07-01
Ahmad Fajrial Fajrial Doddy M Soebadi Tarmono Djojodimedjo Muhammad Yamin S Widodo Pudjirahardjo

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the implementation of diuretic Doppler Ultrasound (DDU) to differentiate the obstructed and non-obstructed kidney. Material & Method: From 28 patients, we gathered data of 48 kidneys in accordance with the inclusion criteria. We evaluated the Doppler Ultrasound Resistive Index (RI) before and after administration of diuretic, using the renogram as the comparison. The result of renogram was categorized into total obstruction (n = 19), partial obstruction (n = 18), and non-obstructive dilatation (n = 3). The statistical analysis was performed using Anova test followed by Tukey HSD test. We also performed diagnostic test, the total and partial obstruction were categorized within obstructed group (n = 37) whereas normal and non-obstructed dilated kidney categorized as non-obstructed group (n = 11). Results: Average change of RI (ΔRI) was 0,542 ± 0,0457 for total obstruction, 0,0428 ± 0,0439 for partial obstruction, 0,0275 ± 0,0392 for normal kidney, -0,0300 ± 0,0361 for non obstructed dilated kidney. The result of normality and homogeneity test indicated the data were normally distributed. One-way Anova test revealed significant differences of ΔRI between groups. The subsequent Tukey HSD test indicated that there were significant differences in total and partial obstruction groups, compared to non-obstructive dilated kidney group. Based on ΔRI cut-off point (0,035) the diagnostic characteristics were 88,5% sensitivity and 72,3% specificity. Conclusion: RI of Diuretic Doppler Ultrasound is a valuable examination to evaluate obstructed and non-obstructed kidney. The cut-off point of 0,035 indicated probability of obstructive kidney. Keywords: Resistive index, renogram, obstructive kidney, non-obstructive kidney. 


##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References

Pais VM, Strandhoy JW, Assimos DG. Upper urinary tract obstruction and trauma. In: Wein AJ et al (eds) Cambell-Walsh Urology. 9th ed. Saunders Elsevier: Philadhelphia; 2007.

Gillenwater YJ. Hydronephrosis. In: Adult and Pediatric Urology. Lippincot William Wilkins: Philadhelphia; 2002. p. 1438–44.

Platt JF, Ellis JH, Rubin JM. Examination of native kidneys with duplex Doppler ultrasound. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1991; 12: 308-18.

Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH. Acute renal obstruction: Evaluation with intrarenal duplex Doppler and conventional US. Radiology. 1993; 186: 685-8.

Tublin ME, Dodd GD, Verdile VP. Acute renal colic: Diagnosis with duplex Doppler US. Radiology. 1994; 193: 697-701.

Chen JH, Pu YS, Liu SP, Chiu TY. Renal hemodynamics in patients with obstructive uropathy evaluated by duplex Doppler sonography. J Urol. 1993; 150: 18-21.

Fung LCT, Steckler RE, Khoury AE. Intrarenal resistive index correlates with renal pelvis pressure. J Urol. 1994; 152: 607-11.

Renowden SA, Cochlin DL. The effect intravenous furosemide on the Doppler waveform in normal kidney. J Ultrasound Med. 1992; 11(3): 65–8.

Yokoyama H, Tsuji Y. Diuretic Doppler ultrasonography in chronic unilateral partial ureteric obstruction in dogs. BJU Int. 2002; 90: 100–4.

Platt J, Rubin J, Ellis J. Distinction between obstructive and nonobstructive pyelocaliectasis duplex Doppler sonography. AJR. 1989; 153: 997–1000.

Rawashdeh YF, Djurhuus JC, Mortensen J, Horlyck A, Frokiaer J. The intra renal resistive index as a pathophysiological marker of obstructive uropathy. J Urol. 2001; 165: 1397–404.

Tublin ME, Bude RO, Platt JF. The resistive index in renal Doppler sonography: Where do we stand? AJR. 2003; 180: 885–92.

Alipour P. Sharhrain Sh. Evaluation of diuretics Doppler sonography in obstructive & non-obstructive hydronephrosis in children. Iranian Journal of Radiology. 2008; 5(S1): 45-6.

Chen JH, Pu, YS, Liu SP. Renal hemodynamics in patients with obstructive uropathy evaluated by duplex Doppler sonography. J Urol. 1993; 150: 18.

Garcia-Pena BM, Keller MS, Schwartz DS. The ultrasonographic differentiation of obstructive versus nonobstructive hydronephrosis in children: A multivariate scoring system. J Urol. 1997; 158: 560.

Anderson JK, Kabalin JN, Cadeddu JA. Anatomy. In: Wein AJ et al (eds) Cambell-Walsh Urology. 9th ed. Saunders Elsevier: Philadhelphia; 2007.

Akata D, Haliloglu M, Caglar M, Tekgul S, Ozmen MN, Akhan O. Renal diuretic duplex Doppler sonography in childhood hydronephrosis. Acta Radiol. 1999; 40: 203–6.

Section
Articles
Copyright Information
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine/Airlangga University