BODY MASS INDEX RELATIONS WITH THE DIFFICULTIES AND COMPLICATIONS OF PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Objective: To identified outcomes and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients of various body mass indices (BMI) to determine the safety of this procedure in patients with elevated BMI.Material & methods: The analytic observational prospective study of patients who underwent PCNL between February to July 2015 in the operating room Soetomo General Hospital Surabaya. Specifically, BMI, stone-free rates, difficulties duringsurgery, complications, and Clavien score were assessed. We evaluate the independent contribution of BMI as a predictor of outcomes. Results: There were 35 selected patients with kidney stone and planned to PCNL, 20 patients were included and 15 patients were excluded from this study. The patients consisted of 10 men (50%) and 10 women (50%). Mean age was 47.55 years (range 33-75). There were 4 patients with diabetes (20%), and 10 patients with hypertension (50%). Mean stone size was 23.30 mm. Stone location was 11 patients (55%) in the right kidney, and 9 patients (45%) in the left. There were 12 patients (60%) with a single stone, and 8 patients (40%) with multiple stones. BMI values were distributed as follows,underweight 1 patient (5%), normoweight 7 patients (35%), overweight 6 patients (30%), obesity 6 patients (30%). Mean skin to stone distance (SSD) was 87.56 mm. Stone free rate was 55%, and difficulties during surgery only seen in 1 patient (5%) bleeding profusely and open surgery was performed. Clavien score in these patients were grade I in 11 patients (55%), grade II in 7 patients (35%), and grade IIIB in 2 patients (10%). The BMI had no significant effect with Intra operative and postoperative difficulties (0.390. p <0.05. CI 95%). However the lower stone free rate had significant effect (0.040. p <0.05. CI 95%).Conclusion: BMI had no significant effect with Intraoperative and postoperative difficulties in PCNL.However, the lower stone-free rate risk associated with elevated BMI was significant.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Body mass index, percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Fernstorm I, Johannson B. Percutaneous extraction of renal calculi. In: Baert AL, Boijsen E, Fuchs WA, Heuck FHW, editors. Frontiers in European Radiology,1st Ed, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 1982. p. 1-24.
Morris DS, Wei JT, Taub DA. Temporal trends in the use of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 2006; 175: 1731–6.
Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC. Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis. J Urol. 2005; 173(3): 848–57.
Pearle MS, Lotan Y. Urinary-lithiasis: Etiology, epidemiology, and pathogenesis. In: Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, Novick AC, Peters CA, Wein AJ, editors. Campbell-Walsh Urology,10th Ed, Elsevier-Saunders; 2012. p. 1257-410.
Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. In: European Association of Urology Guidelines, 2014 Ed. 2014. p. 1124–221.
Armitage JN, Irving SO, Burgess N. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the United Kingdom: result of a prospective data registry. European Association of Urology (internet). 2012 January (Cited January 2012); 61 (2012): (about 6 pp.). Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com
Seitz C, Desai M, Hacker A. Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. European Urol. 2012; 61: 146-58.
Park S, Meng M, Stoller ML. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Technical Aspects. In: Stoller ML, Meng MV, editors. Urinary Stone Disease: the practical guide to medical and surgical management. Humana Press: New Jersey; 2007. p. 621-38.
Agrawal MS, Singh SK, Singh H. Management of multiple/staghorn kidney stones: Open surgery versus PCNL (with or without ESWL). Indian J Urol. 2009 April-June; 25(2): 284-5.
Denstedt JD, Razvi HA, Dushinski J. Percutaneous treatment of large and staghorn renal calculi. J Endourol. 1996; 10(Supp 1): S140, P11–328.
Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of stag-horn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommenda-tions. J Urol. 2005; 173(6): 1991–2000.
Fuller A, Razvi H, Denstedt JD. The CROES Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy global study: the influence of body mass index on outcome. J Urol. 2012 July; 188: 138-44.
Alyami FA, Skinner TA, Norman RW. Impact of body mass index on clinical outcomes associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 April ; 7(3-4): 197-201.
Mazzucchi E, Vicentini FC, Marchini GS, Danilovic A, Brito AH, Srougi M. Percutaneus nephrolithotomy in obese patients: Comparation between the prone and total supine position. J Endourol. 2012 Nov; 26(11): 1437-42.
Manohar T, Jain P, Desai M. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: effective approach to high-risk and morbidly obese patients. Journal of Endourology. 2007 Jan; 21(1): 44-49.
Hess B. Metabolic syndrome, obesity and kidney stones. Arab J Urol. 2012 June; 10: 268-64.
Kadlec AO, Greco K, Fridirici ZC, Hart ST, Vellos T, Turk TM. Metabolic syndrome and urinary stone composition: what factors matter most?. J Urol. 2012 May; 80(4): 805-10.
Bahrami SR, Friedlander JI, Duty BD, Okeke Z, Smith AD. Difficulties with acces in percutaneous renal surgery. Therapeutic advances in Urology (internet). 2011; 3 (2): (about 10 pp). Available from : http://www.sagepub.co.uk/10.1177/1756287211400661
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey. In: Lillemoe KD, editor. Annals of surgery, vol 240, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004(2). p. 205-13.
De la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP. Categorisation of complication and validation of the Clavien Score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eropean Association of Urology (internet). 2012 March (Cited April 2012); 62 (2012): (about 10 pp.). Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com
Palmero JL, De la Rosa IN, Miralles J, Amoros A, Pastor JC, Benedicto A. Study of predictive factors for complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy according to the Clavien classification. Actas Urolgicas Espanolas (internet). 2012 October (cited 2013); Available from : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2012.11.006
El-Assmy AM, Shokeir AA, El-Nahas AR. Outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: effect of body mass index. Eropean Association of Urology (internet). 2006 November (Cited December 2006); 52 (2007): (about 7 pp). Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com
Taylor E, Miller J, Chi T, Stoller ML. Complications associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Transl Androl Urol. 2012 Oct; 1(4): 223-8.