Zulfikar Ali Chaidir A Mochtar


Objective: To study the effects of different bladder volumes on the length of prostatic protrusion as measured by transabdominal ultrasonography. Materials & Method: We did an observational study on 48 patients with BPH and urinary retention in Urology outpatient clinic of Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Jakarta from 1 March 2006 to 28 February 2007. The bladder of each patient was filled with 50 ml normal saline and increased stepwise by 50 ml each time until either an urge to void or a volume of 500 ml was reached. Length of prostatic protrusion was measured by transabdominal ultrasonography at each volume of bladder filling in every patient. Results: The average length of prostatic protrusion in 50, 100, 150, and 200 ml bladder filling was 11,14; 11,42; 11,88; 10,20 mm respectively. There is no statistically significant difference in the length of prostatic protrusion with transabdominal ultrasonography in each bladder volume. Conclusion: Prostatic protrusion length can be measured with bladder volumes between 50 ml to 200 ml and shows no significant difference.



Bladder volume, prostatic protrusion, transabdominal ultrasonography


Chia SJ, Heng CT, Chan SP. Correlation of intravesical prostatic protrusion with bladder outlet obstruction. BJU International 2003; 91: 371 – 74.

Tjahjodjati, Rahardjo D. Hubungan antara residu urine pasca miksi dengan protrusi prostat pada pembesaran prostat jinak tanpa retensi. Jurnal Urologi Indonesia 2003; 10 (1): 15 – 8.

Kirby R, Fitzpatrick J, Kirby M. Shared care for prostatic diseases. Oxford: Isis Medical Media; 1995.

Yuen JSP, Ngiap JTK, Cheng CWS. Effect of bladder volume on transabdominal ultrasound measurement of intravesical prostatic protrusion and volume. International Journal of Urology 2002; 9: 225 – 9.

Rahardjo D. Prostat: Kelainan-kelainan jinak, diagnosis, dan penanganan. Jakarta: Asian Medical; 1999.

Tan YH, Foo KT. Intravesical prostatic protrusion predicts the outcome of a trial without catheter following acute urine retention. Journal of Urology 2003; 170: 2339 – 41.

Bapat SS, Purnapatre SS, Pai VK. Does estimation of prostate volume by abdominal ultrasonography vary with bladder volume: A prospective study with transrectal ultrasonography as reference. Indian Journal of Urology 2006; 22 (4): 322 – 5.

Copyright Information
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine/Airlangga University