EVALUATION OF COSMETIC AND SATISFACTION RATE AFTER URETHROPLASTY PROCEDURE USING PPPS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate patients or parents cosmetic satisfaction rate after urethroplasty procedures in patients with hypospadia. Material & Method: We prospectively collected data from parents whose children underwent urethroplasty procedures in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital since early 2001 until mid 2009, within 18 years old age. Data collected were age, first and last time of operation, type of hypospadia, characteristic of hypospadia, technique used for urethroplasty and time of operation. We also asked questionnaire about parental background and Pediatric Penile Perception Score (PPPS) questions, which contains (1) Satisfaction in shape and position of the urethral meatus, (2) Satisfaction in penile glans appearance, (3) Satisfaction in penile skin appearance, (4) Satisfaction in overall penile appearance. Each question has 4 types of score: very satisfied is 3, satisfied is 2, unsatisfied is 1, and very unsatisfied is 0. Using Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney statistical analysis, we analyzed the association between parental background, type of hypospadia, and technique used for urethroplasty with PPPS. Results: From 178 patients, 76 can be contacted. Mean age of first operation is 5,67 ± 3,66; mean PPPS for meatal appearance is 1,88 ± 0,46; mean PPPS for glans is 2,02 ± 0,32; mean PPPS for penile skin is 1,95 ± 0,39; mean PPPS for general appearance is 1,89 ± 0,45 and mean PPPS is 7,75 ± 1,31. Total PPPS based on type of hypospadia: distal hypospadia 8,1 ± 1,19; medial hypospadia 7,31 ± 1,10 and for proximal hypospadia 7,75 ± 1,32. Total PPPS based on operation technique: TIP 7,72 ± 1,17; Duckett 7,14 ± 1,35 and Onlay Island Flap 8,4 ± 1,8. Using Kruskal Wallis statistic analysis, parents satisfaction rate is significantly associated with monthly income and type of hypospadia (p<0,05). Conclusion: Overall, satisfaction rate of operation outcomes in proximal, medial and distal hypospadia are above average. There is significant association between PPPS with economic status and type of hypospadia. Keywords: Hypospadia, cosmetic, pediatric penile perception score.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Sweet RA, Schroot HG, Kurland R. Study of incidence of hypospadia in Rochester Minnesota 1940-1970 and a case control comparison of etiological factors. Mayo Clinic Proc. 1974; 49: 52-8.
Mouriquand PD, Persad R, Sharma S. Hypospadias repair: Current principles and procedures. Br J Urol 1995; 76(suppl. 3): 9-22.
Moriya K, Kakizaki H, Tanaka H, Furuno T, Higashiyama H, Sano H, et al. Long-term cosmetic and sexual outcome of hypospadias surgery: Norm related study in adolescence. J Urol. 2006; 176(4): 1889-93.
Bubanj TB, Perovic SV, Milicevic RM, Jovcic SB, Marjanovic ZO, Djordjevic MM. Sexual behaviour and sexual function of adults after hypospadia surgery: A comparative study. J Urol. 2004; 171(5): 1876-9.
Weber DM, Schönbucher VB, Landolt MA, Gobet R. The pediatric penile perception score: An instrument for patient self assessment and surgeon evaluation after hypospadia repair. J Urol. 2008; 180(3): 1080-4.
Schwobel MG, Sacher P, Stauffer UG. Denis Browne: Corrective surgery of hypospadias: Long term results. Z Kinderchir. 1987; 42(3): 157-60.
Mureau MA, Slijper FM, Slob AK, Verhulst FC, Nijman RJ. Satisfaction with penile appearance after hypospadia surgeries: The patient and surgeon view. J Urol. 1996; 155(2): 703-6.
Manzoni G, Bracka A, Palminteri E, Marrocco G. Hypospadias surgery: When, what and by whom. BJU Int. 2004; 194: 1118-95.
Djakovic N, Nyarangi-Dix J, Ozturk A, Hohenfellner M. Hypospadias. Adv Urol; 2008. p. 6501-35.
Jones BC, O’Brien M, Chase J, Southwell BR, Hutson JM. Early hypospadias surgery may lead to a better long-term psychosexual outcome. J Urol. 2009; 182: 1744-50.
Rynja SP, Wouters GA, Van Schaijk M, Kok ET, De Jong TP, De Kort LM. Long-term follow up of hypospadias: Functional and cosmetic results. J Urol. 2009; 182: 1736-43.
Mureau MAM, Slijper FME, Nijman RJM, Van derMeulen JC, Verhulst FC, Slob AK. Psychosexual adjustment of children and adolescents after different types of hypospadias surgery: A norm-related study. J Urol. 1995; 154: 1902-7.
Sommerlad BC. A long-term follow-up of hypospadias patients. Brit J Plast Surg. 1975; 8: 324.
Mureau MAM, Slijper FME, Slob AK, Verhulst FC, Nijman RJM. Satisfaction with penile appearance after hypospadias surgery: The patient and surgeon view. J Urol. 1996; 155: 703-6.
Mureau MAM, Slijper FME, Slob AK, Verhulst FC. Genital perception of children, adolescents, and adults operated on for hypospadias: A comparative study. Journal of Sex Research. 1995; 32: 289-98.
Berg R, Svensson J, Aström G. Social and sexual adjustment of men operated for hypospadias during childhood: A controlled study. J Urol. 1981; 125: 313.
Moriya K, Kakizaki H, Tanaka H, Furuno T, Higashiyama H, Sano H, et al. Long-term cosmetic and sexual outcome of hypospadias surgery: Norm related study in adolescence. J Urol. 2006; 176: 1889-93.
Hoag C, Gotto GT, Morrison KB, Coleman GU, MacNeily AE. Long-term functional outcome and satisfaction of patients with hypospadias repaired in childhood. Can Urol Assoc. 2008; 2(1): 23–31.
Sheldon CA, Duckett JW. Hypospadias. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1987; 34: 1259-72.
Duckett JW. Hypospadias. In Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ (eds): Campbell's Urology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 1998; 2: 2093–119.
Dolk H, Vrijheid M, Scott J, Addor M, Botting B. Towards the effective surveillance of hypospadias. Environ Health Perspect. 2004; 112: 398-402.