LAPAROSCOPIC LIVING DONOR NEPHRECTOMY: FEASIBILITY AND FIRST EXPERIENCE IN INDONESIA
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Objective: To report our first experience laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN). Material & Method: A 37 year-old man was planned for the living-donor transplantation. The recipient was a 63 year-old man sufferingfrom end stage renal disease, and hypertensive heart disease. The donor and recipient were allowed for positive qualification evaluated preoperatively. We applied a transperitoneal approach for the left kidney. Results: The operation time was 300 minutes and the estimated blood loss was 600 mL. The first warm ischemia time was 15 minutes and 24 seconds. There were no major intraoperative and postoperative complications. The donor began oral intake and mobilization within 10 hours and was hospitalized for 4 days. The recipient’s serum creatinine levels reached near baseline levels (1,5 mg/dL) at day 6. Conclusion: LLDN is technically feasible in Indonesia and may increase the rate of kidney donation in Indonesia due to the minimally invasive nature of the procedure.Keywords: Renal transplantation, laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy, Indonesia.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Simforoosh N, Basiri A, Tabibi A, Shakhssalim N, Hosseini Moghaddam SM. Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: A randomized controlled trial. BJU Int. 2005; 95(6): 851-5.
Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 1995; 60(9): 1047-9.
Velidedeoglu E, Williams N, Brayman KL, Desai NM, Campos L, Palanjian M, et al. Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and hand-assisted approaches to live-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 2002; 74: 169-72.
Minnee RC, Idu MM. A review of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Neth J Med. 2010; 68(5): 199-206.
Wilson CH, Sanni A, Rix DA, Soomro NA. Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; 11: CD006124.
Shokeir AA. Open versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A focus on the safety of donors and the need for a donor registry. J Urol. 2007; 178(5): 1860-6.
Tooher RL, Rao MM, Scott DF, Wall DR, Francis DM, Bridgewater FH, et al. A systematic review of laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 2004; 78(3): 404-14.
Nanidis TG, Antcliffe D, Kokkinos C, Borysiewicz CA, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation; A meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2008; 247(1): 58 - 70.
Simforoosh N, Basiri A, Shakhssalim N, Ziaee SA, Tabibi A, Moghaddam SM. Effect of warm ischaemia on graft outcome in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2006; 20(11): 895-8.
Lind MY, Hazebroek EJ, Hop WC, Weimar W, Jaap BH, Ijzermans JN. Right-sided laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: is reluctance still justified? Transplantation. 2002; 75(7): 1045-8.
Minnee RC, Bernelman WA, Maartense S, Bernelman FJ, Gouma DJ, Idu MM. Left or right kidney in hand-assisted donor nephrectomy? A randomized controlled trial. Transplantation. 2008; 85(2): 203-8.
Kok NF, Dols LF, Hunink MG, Alwayn IP, Tran KT, Weimar W. Complex vascular anatomy in live kidney donation: Imaging and consequences for clinical outcome. Transplantation. 2008; 85(12): 1760-5.
Minnee RC, Surachno S, Bemelman F, ten Berqe IJ, Kox C, Legemate DA, et al. Impact of additional vascular reconstructions on survival of kidney transplants. Int Surg. 2008; 93(2): 111-5.
Kok NF, Weimar W, Alwayn IP, Ijzermans JN. The current practice of live donor nephrectomy in Europe. Transplantation. 2006; 82(7): 830-4.
Matas AJ, Bartlett ST, Leichtman AB, Delmonico FL. Morbidity and mortality after living kidney donation, 1999-2001: Survey of United States transplant centers. Am J Transplant. 2003; 3(7): 830-4.
Yuzawa K, Shinoda M, Fukao K. Outcome of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in 2005: National Survey of Japanese Transplantation Centers. Transplant Proc. 2006; 38(10): 3409-11.
Yuzawa K, Shinoda M, Fukao K. Outcome of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in 2007: National Survey of Japanese Transplantation Centers. Transplant Proc. 2009; 41(1): 85-7.
Agarwal A, Murdock P, Fridell JA. Comparison of histidine tryptophan ketoglutarate solution and University of Wisconsin solution in prolonged cold preservation of kidney allografts. Transplantation. 2006; 81(3): 480-2.
Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Schulam PG, Bender JS, Magnuson TH, Montgomery R. Comparison of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy versus the standard open approach. Transplant Proc. 1997; 29: 138-9.
Koffron A, Herman C, Gross D, Ferrario M, Kaufman D, Abecassis M, et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Analysis of donor and recipient outcomes. Transplant Proc. 2001; 33: 1111.
Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho F, Morton A, Rosenberger WF, Evans D, et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg. 1997; 226: 483-90.
Mitre AI, Denes FT, Nahas WC, Simoes FA, Colombo JR, Piovesan AC, et al. Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy. Clinics. 2009; 64(1): 23–8.
Jacobs SC, Cho E, Foster C, Liao P, Bartlett ST. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The University of Maryland 6-year experience. J Urol. 2004; 171: 47-51.
Sasaki TM, Finelli F, Bugarin E, Fowlkes D, Trollinger J, Barhyte DY, et al. Is laparoscopic donor nephrectomy the new criterion standard? Arch Surg. 2000; 135: 943-7.
Su LM, Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Jarrett TW, Trock BJ, Sinkov V, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(2): 358-63.