COMPLICATION AND SAFETY OF TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSY USING NOVEL AFFORDABLE VY PROBE (TPPB-VY) IN CLINICAL PRACTICE : A PILOT STUDY
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Objective: This study was aimed to know the complication and safety of TPPB-VY in clinical practice. Material & Methods: TPPB were performed in 34 patients between January 2019 and Juni 2021. Ethical approval of this study was sought from the hospital authorities (IRB number: LB.02.01/X.6.5/ 55/2020). Patients underwent systematic 10-12 core TPPB depend on the prostate volume with intravenous light sedation. The patient was included to the study if PSA ≥ 4 ng/ml and/or Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) results suggestive of prostate cancer. Procedures were performed without any antibiotic prophylaxis or an enema before the procedure and post procedure the patients just get an oral fluoroquinolones and low potent analgetics (if needed). The complication include pain level post procedure (using VAS), perineal hematoma, fever and retention post biopsy were recorded. Results: In all, 34 patients were included in the study. The result showed that perineal pain perceived by patients post procedure were 76.47% (26 out of 34 patients) but the VAS score just mild around 0-2. There were 23.53% (8 out of 34 patients) hematuria, 5.88% (2 out of 34 patients) acute urinary retention and 2.9 % (1 out of 34 patients) perineal hematoma. No fever or clinical infection was observed and 82.35% (28 out of 34 patients) patients presented with minor complications (ClavienDindo I). Only one of the patients were hospitalized due to the post-biopsy complication that need intervention. Conclusion: This is the first study TPPB using Novel Affordable VY probe. The results show clinically insignificant complication without infection. TPPB using Novel Affordable VY probe is feasible and safe.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
TPPB-VY, prostate cancer, VY probe, complications, safety
Litwin MS, Tan HJ. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Review. Jama. 2017; 317(24): 2532-42.
Andriole GL, Catalona WJ. The diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Annual review of medicine. 1991; 42: 9-15.
Huang G-L, Kang C-H, Lee W-C, Chiang P-H. Comparisons of cancer detection rate and complications between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy approaches - a single center preliminary study. BMC urology. 2019; 19(1): 101.
Jones TA, Radtke JP, Hadaschik B, Marks LS. Optimizing safety and accuracy of prostate biopsy. Curr Opin Urol. 2016; 26(5): 472-80.
Xiang J, Yan H, Li J, Wang X, Chen H, Zheng X. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2019; 17(1): 31.
Anastasiadis A, Zapała Ł, Cordeiro E, Antoniewicz A, Dimitriadis G, and De Reijke T. Complications of prostate biopsy. Expert review of anticancer therapy. 2013; 13(7): 829-837.
Pramod SV, Safriadi F, Kuddah Y, Handoko R. Affordable Novel Device (VY) for Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: A Trial on Prostate Mannequin. MethodsX. 2021 Jun 18: 101417.
Mochtar C.A, Atmoko W, Umbas R and Hamid A.R.A.H. Prostate cancer detection rate in Indonesian men. Asian Journal Of Surgery. 2018; 41(2): 163-169.
Galfano A, Novara G, Iafrate M, Cosentino M, Cavalleri S, Artibani W and Ficarra V. Prostate biopsy: the transperineal approach. EAU-EBU update series. 2007; 5(6): 241-249.
Miah S, Eldred-Evans D, Simmons L.A, Shah T.T, Kanthabalan A, Arya M, Winkler M, McCartan N, Freeman A, Punwani S and Moore C.M. Patient reported outcome measures for transperineal template prostate mapping biopsies in the PICTURE study. The Journal Of Urology. 2018; 200(6): 1235-1240.
Galetti T.P, Dal Moro F, Milani C, Pinto F and Pagano F. Patient’s preparation in order to reduce pain, anxiety and complications of TRUS prostatic biopsies. European Urology Supplements. 2002; 1(6): 3-7.
Guo L.H, Wu R, Xu H.X, Xu J.M, Wu J, Wang S, Bo X.W and Liu B.J. Comparison between ultrasound guided transperineal and transrectal prostate biopsy: a prospective, randomized, and controlled trial. Scientific reports. 2015; 5: 16089.
Marra G, Ploussard G, Futterer J and Valerio M. Controversies in MR targeted biopsy: alone or combined, cognitive versus software-based fusion, transrectal versus transperineal approach?. World Journal Of Urology. 2019; 37(2): 277-287.