Objective: The aim of this study was to compare long term follow-up of sexual dysfunction between end-to-end anastomosis or buccal mucosa graft in short segment bulbar urethral stricture. Material & Method: We performed a meta analysis of cohort study. The data sources was MEDLINE from 1980 through 2011. A fixed effects model with Mantel-Haenszel method was used to calculate the pooled Risk Ratio (RRs) and 95% Confidence Interval (CIs). We assessed the heterogeneity by calculating the I2 statistic. All analyses were performed with Stata statistical software, version 10.0 (Stata Corp). Results: We analyzed 6 cohort studies. End-to-end anastomosis and buccal mucosa graft patients who complained about sexual dysfunction were 24.6% (45/183) and 9.1% (11/122) respectively, with overall RR 2.54 (95% CI, 0.22-0.69, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Buccal mucosa graft showed a superior outcome compared to end-to-end anastomosis, based on sexual dysfunction in ≤ 3 cm bulbar urethral stricture treatments.Keywords: Sexual dysfunction, end-to-end anastomosis, buccal mucosa graft, anterior urethral stricture.
Jordan GH, McCammon KA. Surgery of the penis and urethra. In: Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. p. 956-1000.
Santucci RA, Mario LA, McAninch JW. Anastomotic urethroplasty for bulbar urethral stricture: Analysis of 168 patients. J Urol. 2002; 167: 1715.
Pansadoro V, Emiliozzi P. Internal urethrotomy in the management of anterior urethral strictures: Long-term follow-up. J Urol. 1996; 156: 73.
Heyns CF, Steenkamp JW, De Kock ML. Treatment of male urethral strictures: Is repeated dilation or internal urethrotomy useful? J Urol. 1998; 160: 356.
William MB, Schlossberg SM. Anterior urethral reconstruction: Excision with primary anastomosis. In: Textbook of Reconstructive Urologic Surgery. United Kingdom: Informa; 2008. p. 453–8.
Gomez RG. Stricture excision and primary anastomosis for anterior urethral stricture. In: Urethral Reconstructive Surgery. United States: Humana Press; 2008. p. 107–18.
Barbagli G. Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty. In: Urethral Reconstructive Surgery. United States: Humana Press; 2008. p. 119–35.
Mangera A, Patterson JM, Chapple CR. A systematic review of graft augmentation urethroplasty techniques for the treatment of anterior urethral stricture. European Urol. 2011; 59: 797.
Angermeier KW. Anterior urethral reconstruction: Ventral Grafts. In: Textbook of reconstructive urologic surgery. United Kingdom: Informa; 2008. p. 459–65.
Barbagli G, Lazzeri M. Anterior urethral reconstruction: Dorsal grafts. In: Textbook of Reconstructive Urologic Surgery. United Kingdom: Informa; 2008. p. 466–73.
Santucci RA, Al-Qudah HS. Buccal mucosal on lay urethroplasty or anastomotic urethroplasty for short and medium length urethral strictures: Which is better? J Urol. 2006; 68 suppl. 5A: MP-17.03.
MacDonald MF, Santucci RA. Review and treatment algorithm of open surgical techniques for management of urethral stricture. J Urol. 2005; 65: 9–15.
Barbagli G, De Angelis M, Romano G, Lazzeri M. Long-term follow-up of bulbar end-to-end anastomosis: Retrospective Analysis of 153 Patients in a Single Center Experience. J Urol. 2007; 178: 2470.
Dogra PN, Saini AK, Seth A. Erectile dysfunction after anterior urethroplasty: A Prospective Analysis of Incidence and Probability of Recovery – Single Center Experience. J Urol; 2011. p. 78.
Yang CC, Bradley WE. Reflex innervation of the bulbocavernosus muscle. BJU Int. 2000; 85: 857.
Brandes SB. Vascular anatomy of genital skin and the urethra: Implications for Urethral Stricture. In: Urethral Reconstructive Surgery. United States: Humana Press; 2008. p. 9–18.Guralnick
Guralnick ML, Webster GD. The augmented anastomotic urethroplasty: Indications and outcome in 29 Patients. J Urol. 2001; 165: 1496.
Barbagli G, Kulkarni SB. Controversies in urethral stricture. Annual Meeting American Urological Association [CD-ROM]. Washington; 2011.
Bullock TL, Brandes SB. Adult anteroir urethral stricture: A National Practice Patterns Surveys of Board Certified Urologists in the United States. J Urol. 2007; 177: 685.